BASSEN

Former title 10 active duty or reserve

Former title 10 active duty or reserve

The Bassen case is a groundbreaking class action lawsuit brought on behalf of approximately 8,500 active-duty service members who were involuntarily discharged for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine. It also extends protection to other active-duty personnel who were pressured into early retirement or constructively discharged as a direct result of their vaccination status.

This case represents all former service members—excluding the Coast Guard—who were serving under Title 10 active-duty orders at the time of their discharge. That includes both Regular and Reserve components who were federally activated (“federalized”) when their careers were abruptly cut short.

At its core, Bassen v. United States is about holding the government accountable for unfair separations and restoring the pay, benefits, and honor that thousands of service members rightfully earned.

Opt-in Qualification Form

Complete the Opt-In Form to see if you qualify.

LEARN MORE ABOUT HOW WE CAN HELP YOU

If you’re interested in learning about the cases we have already filed and whether we might be able to help you, you’ve come to the right place. In this video, you’ll get an overview of the cases on file and what qualifying criteria are for each.

PLAY VIDEO

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

There are currently three class action cases that have been filed in the Federal Court of Claims seeking back pay for service members who refused to take a COVID-19 vaccine under the Department of Defense’s (“DoD”) COVID-19 vaccine mandate (August 24, 2021 through January 10, 2023) and were discharged, kicked off active-duty, forced into early retirement, involuntarily transferred to the inactive ready reserve, were denied pay, were denied potential promotions, denied any other benefits or retirement benefits, for their refusal to do so.

Bassen v. United States (Active-Duty). Bassen was filed on behalf of the approximately 8,500 active-duty service members who were involuntarily discharged due to their unvaccinated status, as well as any other active-duty service members who were forced into early retirement or were constructively discharged due to their vaccination status.

Konie v. United States (National Guard/Reserves). Konie is seeking back pay and other remedies for 70,000-100,000 members of the Air and Army National Guard, and for reserve members of all services, who were dropped from active-duty orders or active status, denied pay or benefits, or prohibited from participating in drills, training, other duties due to their vaccinated status.

Harkins v. United States (Active-Duty and Reserve). Harkins was filed on behalf of the active-duty and reserve Coast Guard members who were involuntarily discharged due to their unvaccinated status, as well as any other Coast Guard members who were forced into early retirement or were constructively discharged due to their vaccination status.

If you fall into any of the above categories, you may have a claim for back pay, financial compensation or other remedies such as reinstatement or correction of military records. The easiest way to find out is to complete the opt-in form and sign our retainer, so we can review your file.

The first step is to complete the brief opt-in form and to sign the representation agreement to allow us to preliminarily determine whether you have a claim for back pay.

After that, members of our team will follow up with you to collect additional information including your DD-214 and other supporting documents.

Important note: Signing a representation agreement with Military Back Pay attorneys does not obligate you to pursue a case, nor does it obligate the Military Back Pay attorneys to represent you or file a case. Either party may terminate at any time.

No. Back pay comes from correcting your records and filing your claim. You never have to re-enlist or put on a uniform again.

Most service members are surprised at what they’re owed. Even short gaps in service or pay can lead to thousands of dollars in back pay and benefits. Our team will review your situation at no cost.

The order ended the mandate, but it didn’t cut checks. Payment only comes after your case is filed and approved by the Board and Court. If you don’t file, nothing happens.

Not with us. We guide you through a streamlined system. You upload documents and we handle the legal work. No upfront costs, no hassle.

Yes. Even a single missed drill weekend counts. Beyond that, reserve time can affect your retirement points, promotions, and benefits. It’s all part of your rightful claim.

It costs you nothing to hire us as your attorneys unless and until you receive back pay or other compensation. Instead, if you retain us, we will represent you under a contingency fee arrangement where you pay no attorney’s fees unless you recover money. If your claim is unsuccessful, you will not owe us anything. The contingency fee agreement contains the details.

About MilitaryBackPay.com
MilitaryBackPay.com is the website for Attorneys Dale Saran, Brandon Johnson, and J. Andrew Meyer who are representing former service members seeking back pay in three putative class action cases pending in the Court of Federal Claims.
Skip to content